<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The sphere packing problem in dimension 8 · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.04246/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.04246/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The sphere packing problem in dimension 8 — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362773</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1603.04246:48362773</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 21:17:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Show HN: Glq LLM quantization using E8 lattice&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have with the help of AI create an open source method of E8 LLM code book quantization library called glq. I was interested in creating Glq as a PC gamer and devops, interested in both LLMs and AI. The current high RAM prices and LLM resource usage also inspired me to write glq. A question arises could you try and squeeze more out a gaming GPU with limited VRAM size by using alternative LLM compression methods? Glq is effective compared to other LLM quantization algorithms at between 2-bits per weight up to 4 bits per weight. The effectiveness of glq at low bits per words is due to the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.04246/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item><item><title>The sphere packing problem in dimension 8 — mentioned by stncls</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31997874</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1603.04246:31997874</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 07:29:29 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;No no no, she is legit, no doubt here. She was a star way before the current events. She solved a long-standing open problem in fundamental maths. This is the holy grail in maths research. The main resulting paper is single-author, so there is no doubt who did the work. She got her PhD from Bonn in 2013 and became a full prof at EPFL in 2018 (in EU this type of progression takes 10-20 years, and this is extremely impressive even by US standards). It was very clear to everyone at that time that she would be big. Or just look at the paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04246 you can&amp;#x27;t fake that…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.04246/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item><item><title>The sphere packing problem in dimension 8 — mentioned by ecma</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11395552</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1603.04246:11395552</guid><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:27:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The paper [0] was linked, the article gave context to the problem and outlined the approach. What more do you want? [0] http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04246&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.04246/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item></channel></rss>
