<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Delta State Replicated Data Types · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.01529/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.01529/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Delta State Replicated Data Types — mentioned by linkdd</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47239380</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1603.01529:47239380</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 21:35:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Last-Write-Win CRDTs are nice, but I wish the article talked about where CRDT really shine, which is when the state truly converge in a non-destructive way, for example: 1) Counters While not really useful, they demonstrate this well: - mutations are +n and -n - their order do not matter - converging the state is a matter of applying the operations of remote peers locally 2) Append-only data structures Useful for accounting, or replication of time-series/logs with no master/slave relationship between nodes (where writes would be accepted only on a &amp;quot;master&amp;quot; node). - the only mutation is…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.01529/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item><item><title>Delta State Replicated Data Types — mentioned by rklaehn</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30985438</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1603.01529:30985438</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 06:43:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, there is a lot of awesome stuff that just works. SSB, the entire DAT/hypercore community, tools like syncthing that just do one thing well. I like the SSB approach of just embracing subjectivity. I was quite amazed when discovering all this at dtn.is (Before I only knew the IPFS community). But I feel there is still something missing for very wide spread adoption. What we are trying to do with TLFS is to combine - a CRDT with strict schema ( Adapted from https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01529 ) - a built in way to do schema evolution ( Adapted from https://www.inkandswitch.com/cambria/ )…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.01529/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item><item><title>Delta State Replicated Data Types — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27574837</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1603.01529:27574837</guid><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2021 23:46:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Delta State Replicated Data Types (2016)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.01529/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item><item><title>Delta State Replicated Data Types — mentioned by iamaleksey</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15146981</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1603.01529:15146981</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 08:28:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Except they are. Catalogued as δ-CRDT, under Lexicographic Counter in https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.01529.pdf edit: Although to be fair that blog post is ancient and covers Cassandra 2.0, now no longer supported. Counters were rewritten in Cassandra 2.1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.01529/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item></channel></rss>
