HackerPapers

arXiv:1602.08759gr-qc

Did GW150914 produce a rotating gravastar?

Cecilia Chirenti, Luciano Rezzolla

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The interferometric LIGO detectors have recently measured the first direct gravitational-wave signal from what has been interpreted as the inspiral, merger and ringdown of a binary system of black holes. The signal-to-noise ratio of the measured signal is large enough to leave little doubt that it does refer to the inspiral of two massive and ultracompact objects, whose merger yields a rotating black hole. Yet, the quality of the data is such that some room is left for alternative interpretations that do not involve black holes, but other objects that, within classical general relativity, can be equally massive and compact, namely, gravastars. We here consider the hypothesis that the merging objects were indeed gravastars and explore whether the merged object could therefore be not a black hole but a rotating gravastar. After comparing the real and imaginary parts of the ringdown signal of GW150914 with the corresponding quantities for a variety of gravastars, and notwithstanding the very limited knowledge of the perturbative response of rotating gravastars, we conclude it is not possible to model the measured ringdown of GW150914 as due to a rotating gravastar.

arXiv comments
6 pages, 4 figures. Extended and improved discussion of the ringdown. Conclusions unchanged and strengthened; matches version accepted for publication in PRD
Journal reference
Phys. Rev. D 94, 084016 (2016)
DOI
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.084016
Subjects
gr-qcGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology astro-ph.HEHigh Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Dec 2016 to Dec 2016.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • > Is there any empirical evidence that favors classic black holes over gravastars Yes. http://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.084... (preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.08759) So you're still left with gravastar models that can co-exist with black holes.

      raattgiftView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.