<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The AV1 Constrained Directional Enhancement Filter (CDEF) · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1602.05975/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1602.05975/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The AV1 Constrained Directional Enhancement Filter (CDEF) — mentioned by twotwotwo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16806909</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1602.05975:16806909</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:09:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Comparing HEVC-based and AV1-based: there&amp;#x27;s a tech demo (that I&amp;#x27;ve posted here...a lot now heh) at https://people.xiph.org/~tdaede/av1stilldemo/. Both AV1 and x265 intra look great. If the artifacts when you compare to originals bug you, remember this is just a test at a level where JPEG is painfully blocky, and you can go higher! Visually, I think AV1 adds less DCT-ish noise, but tends to blur small, low-contrast details a little more than x265. (Compare the ends of tree branches on the default image, Crepuscular Rays, or faraway tiles and details in Mercado dos Lavradores. Haven&amp;#x27;t done…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1602.05975/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.MM</category></item></channel></rss>
