arXiv:1602.04781cs.CC
On Alternation and the Union Theorem
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
Under the assumption $P=Σ_2^p$, we prove a new variant of the Union Theorem of McCreight and Meyer for the class $Σ_2^p$. This yields a union function $F$ which is computable in time $F(n)^c$ for some constant $c$ and satisfies $P=DTIME(F)=Σ_2(F)=Σ_2^p$ with respect to a subfamily $(\tilde{S}_i)$ of $Σ_2$-machines. We show that this subfamily does not change the complexity classes $P$ and $Σ_2^p$. Moreover, a padding construction shows that this also implies $DTIME(F^c)=Σ_2(F^c)$. On the other hand, we prove a variant of Gupta's result who showed that $DTIME(t)\subsetneqΣ_2(t)$ for time-constructible functions $t(n)$. Our variant of this result holds with respect to the subfamily $(\tilde{S}_i)$ of $Σ_2$-machines. We show that these two results contradict each other. Hence the assumption $P=Σ_2^p$ cannot hold.
Interesting that this is the second P!=NP proof from a University of Bonn researcher. Other one, by Mathias Hauptmann, is here: https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.04781 I never did hear the status of Hauptmann's proof (I'm not connected to academia so only know what I've read on the…
ethan_gView on HNParent context