<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On constraining the speed of gravitational waves following GW150914 · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1602.04188/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1602.04188/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On constraining the speed of gravitational waves following GW150914 — mentioned by Zenst</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19603893</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1602.04188:19603893</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 10:36:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes we still don&amp;#x27;t know exactly the speed of gravity and as it stands we know it to be the around the same speed of light with a margin of 70% ( https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.04188 ). But with so many theories at play, we still don&amp;#x27;t know for sure. Indeed, some still believe that the speed of light has changed over time - hence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_speed_of_light . Which as a theory, if true, would really mess up distant astronomy calculations for some. As you say, would be nice to have some definitive experiment that reduced the margin for error and give a more definitive…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1602.04188/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
