<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1602.03837/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1602.03837/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47343476</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1602.03837:47343476</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 22:52:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; physics tends to be much more reproducible than biology, and CS doubly-so. With physics I think there is a better culture of reproduction, but that is, I believe, due more to culture. That it is acceptable to &amp;quot;be slow&amp;quot;. There&amp;#x27;s a high stress on being methodical and extremely precise. The prestige is built on making your work bulletproof, and so you&amp;#x27;re really encouraged to help others reproduce your work as it strengthens it. You&amp;#x27;re also encouraged to analyze in detail and to faithfully reproduce, because finding cracks also yields prestige. I don&amp;#x27;t know if it&amp;#x27;s the money, but no one is in…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1602.03837/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item><item><title>Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12903472</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1602.03837:12903472</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 20:05:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Gravitons appear in several different families of theory. We have not observed any of them; the interaction cross-section is so small (because gravity is so weak) that we have no hope of observing a single graviton, or failing to observe an expected one, any time soon. Gravitational waves have spin 2 symmetry and are massless. A straightforward quantization of a gravitational wave leads to gravitons as a spin 2 massless gauge boson. Conversely, in almost any gauge theory that admits a massless spin 2 particle, that particle mediates a force almost exactly like gravitation, and is amenable to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1602.03837/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
