<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A heuristic for boundedness of ranks of elliptic curves · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1602.01431/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1602.01431/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A heuristic for boundedness of ranks of elliptic curves — mentioned by impendia</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49376352</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1602.01431:49376352</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 15:53:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; The record before this morning was 29 and people suspected that was as high as it got. Exactly this. A fundamental question in the subject is, whether elliptic curve ranks are bounded. Contrast with e.g. prime numbers, of which are known to be infinitely many. If you set a new record for the largest known prime, then that&amp;#x27;s cool but everyone knew there were plenty out there to discover. This paper, by leading experts, https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.01431 made a significant impact in the field, coming up with a heuristic argument for why ranks of elliptic curves should be bounded. The same…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1602.01431/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item></channel></rss>
