<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Co-Occurrence Patterns in the Voynich Manuscript · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1601.07435/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1601.07435/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Co-Occurrence Patterns in the Voynich Manuscript — mentioned by ideonexus</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13055133</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1601.07435:13055133</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:07:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m not sure how a photo-print of the manuscript will help cryptographers. Doesn&amp;#x27;t the digital version available at archive.org provide better opportunities for analysis? https://archive.org/details/TheVoynichManuscript For example, a friend of mine is fascinated with the Zodiac Killer&amp;#x27;s unsolved ciphers, so he put the note into a program, where you can replace the cryptic symbols in the serial killer&amp;#x27;s note with various letters: http://www.oranchak.com/zodiac/webtoy/ A printed-book of the Voynich Manuscript--to my mind--actually reduces the ability of cryptographers to decode it (if there&amp;#x27;s…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1601.07435/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Co-Occurrence Patterns in the Voynich Manuscript — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11065166</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1601.07435:11065166</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 13:44:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Co – Occurrence Patterns in the Voynich Manuscript&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1601.07435/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
