<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Strongly interacting dynamics and the search for new physics at the LHC · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1601.04027/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1601.04027/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Strongly interacting dynamics and the search for new physics at the LHC — mentioned by acqq</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19307071</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1601.04027:19307071</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:26:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; makes it seem that the standard model is pretty flexible It&amp;#x27;s simply not true that these 500 papers are all &amp;quot;the standard model&amp;quot; and that can be verified by reading the actual papers. E.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.04027 &amp;quot;Strongly interacting dynamics and the search for new physics at the LHC&amp;quot; New physics != the standard model I don&amp;#x27;t know the origin of that &amp;quot;500 papers&amp;quot; list (it seems somebody simply made a jsfiddle out of who knows which list and smuggled that in Wikipedia) but they can&amp;#x27;t be interpreted as &amp;quot;all the standard model.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1601.04027/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-lat</category></item></channel></rss>
