<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The proof-theoretic strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs and two colors · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1601.00050/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1601.00050/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The proof-theoretic strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs and two colors — mentioned by Sniffnoy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14884458</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1601.00050:14884458</guid><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2017 04:34:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A note -- if you&amp;#x27;re linking to arXiv, it&amp;#x27;s better to link to the abstract (https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.00050) rather than directly to the PDF. From the abstract, one can easily click through to the PDF; not so the reverse. And the abstract allows one to do things like see different versions of the paper, search for other things by the same authors, etc. Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1601.00050/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.LO</category></item><item><title>The proof-theoretic strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs and two colors — mentioned by xamuel</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14884247</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1601.00050:14884247</guid><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2017 03:11:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A genuine breakthrough in the narrow realm of reverse mathematics. (The article exagerates that into a breakthrough in general, par for the course for science journalism.) Here&amp;#x27;s the actual paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1601.00050.pdf The quantamagazine article puts a lot of emphasis on the youth (34 and 27) of the researchers. I guess the journalist overlooked a more surprising age. Lu &amp;quot;Jiayi&amp;quot; Liu (whom the article briefly mentions for a preliminary result) was I think 20 years old when he made his discovery in 2012 which was a tentative step toward the stronger result in this article. I saw…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1601.00050/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.LO</category></item></channel></rss>
