<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Beyond $Λ$CDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1512.05356/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1512.05356/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Beyond $Λ$CDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead — mentioned by astro123</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19801172</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1512.05356:19801172</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 20:15:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I was maybe a bit too cavalier here. I think I understand what the author means - the data that they gather is understood in the context of the model that we think is best. But, it isn&amp;#x27;t as if cosmologists are rigidly holding to the model. Here&amp;#x27;s a paper looking at extensions to lambda CDM https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.05356. As I mentioned, changing GR is being looked at as an alternative to DE http://www.resceu.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/workshops/resceu08s/presen... People aren&amp;#x27;t challenging some things though - I don&amp;#x27;t think anyone is seriously working on cosmologies that don&amp;#x27;t include a big bang…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1512.05356/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
