<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Always Valid Inference: Bringing Sequential Analysis to A/B Testing · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1512.04922/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1512.04922/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Always Valid Inference: Bringing Sequential Analysis to A/B Testing — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12308016</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1512.04922:12308016</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 20:11:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Sequential A/B testing at Optimizely&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1512.04922/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.ST</category></item><item><title>Always Valid Inference: Bringing Sequential Analysis to A/B Testing — mentioned by leo_pekelis</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11451905</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1512.04922:11451905</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 01:02:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, this is Leo, Optimizely&amp;#x27;s statistician. If you&amp;#x27;re looking for a more scientific paper, maybe take a look at this one we wrote recently: http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.04922 Should have everything you would ever want to know about the method. I agree with you that the problem of inference and interpretation between A/B data, algorithms, and the people who make decisions from them is a hard one and worth working on. That said, I do think the two sources of error our stats engine addresses - repeatedly checking results, and cherry picking from many metrics and variations - did make progress in…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1512.04922/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.ST</category></item></channel></rss>
