<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Improved Black Hole Fireworks: Asymmetric Black-Hole-to-White-Hole Tunneling Scenario · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1512.04566/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1512.04566/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Improved Black Hole Fireworks: Asymmetric Black-Hole-to-White-Hole Tunneling Scenario — mentioned by eesmith</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36442848</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1512.04566:36442848</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 04:40:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a copy of https://uncnewsarchive.unc.edu/2014/09/23/carolinas-laura-me... , which it gives as a source. That is titled &amp;quot;Carolina’s Laura Mersini-Houghton shows that black holes do not exist&amp;quot;. That source (unlike this one) gives a date - from 2014. So, not a new study. The only publications mentioned are http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1406.1525 (&amp;quot;Backreaction of Hawking Radiation on a Gravitationally Collapsing Star I: Black Holes?&amp;quot;) and http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1409.1837 (&amp;quot;Back-reaction of the Hawking radiation flux on a gravitationally collapsing star II&amp;quot;). Google Scholar lists 72…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1512.04566/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
