<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Toward an Efficient Website Fingerprinting Defense · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1512.00524/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1512.00524/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Toward an Efficient Website Fingerprinting Defense — mentioned by fowlslegs</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13504169</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1512.00524:13504169</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 01:10:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;SD dev here. You might be interested to check out https://github.com/freedomofpress/fingerprint-securedrop (note: still in experimental stages). We&amp;#x27;re going to be using the framework/ ML pipeline to evaluate server-side defenses (e.g., https://petsymposium.org/2017/papers/issue2/paper54-2017-2-s...), and are also working w/ Tor dev Mike Perry who is working on a solution or set of solutions to the problems of website &amp;amp; circuit fingerprinting with regards to Tor at the protocol level. Edit: What Mike is trying to implement is based on https://arxiv.org/pdf/1512.00524.pdf.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1512.00524/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
