<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Understanding Adversarial Training: Increasing Local Stability of Neural Nets through Robust Optimization · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1511.05432/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1511.05432/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Understanding Adversarial Training: Increasing Local Stability of Neural Nets through Robust Optimization — mentioned by nl</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12862749</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1511.05432:12862749</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 10:28:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572 is a Goodfellow et. al. (ie, the person who&amp;#x27;s Tweet you note above) paper where they show adversarial examples do apply across architectures (as you state above), but they show that using the adversarial examples during training has a regularization effect and improves performance: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1511.05432v3.pdf takes a similar approach: We show that adversarial training of ANNs is in fact robustification of the network optimization, and that our proposed framework generalizes previous approaches for increasing local stability of ANNs. Experimental…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1511.05432/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
