HackerPapers

arXiv:1511.04599cs.LG

DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networks

Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-Dezfooli, Alhussein Fawzi, Pascal Frossard

Abstract

State-of-the-art deep neural networks have achieved impressive results on many image classification tasks. However, these same architectures have been shown to be unstable to small, well sought, perturbations of the images. Despite the importance of this phenomenon, no effective methods have been proposed to accurately compute the robustness of state-of-the-art deep classifiers to such perturbations on large-scale datasets. In this paper, we fill this gap and propose the DeepFool algorithm to efficiently compute perturbations that fool deep networks, and thus reliably quantify the robustness of these classifiers. Extensive experimental results show that our approach outperforms recent methods in the task of computing adversarial perturbations and making classifiers more robust.

arXiv comments
In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Oct 2016 to Dec 2021.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • I'm less familiar with poisoning, but at least for test-time robustness, the current benchmark for image classifiers is AutoAttack [0,1]. It's an ensemble of adaptive & parameter-free gradient-based white-box and gradient-free black-box attacks. Submitted academic work is…

      orange3xchickenView on HNParent context

    • See also: https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.04599 IMO, (at least) two pieces of research on the subject means that the short answer really is "yes". Maybe not the exact technique used in the paper in the original post, but conceptually similar techniques.

      joshuawarner32View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.