<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Calculating the Potato Radius of Asteroids using the Height of Mt. Everest · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1511.04297/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1511.04297/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Calculating the Potato Radius of Asteroids using the Height of Mt. Everest — mentioned by azernik</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17565377</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1511.04297:17565377</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 11:37:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;According to quite a lot of comparative planetary geology work, Mt. Everest, Mauna Kea, etc. are pretty close to the height limit imposed by gravity and structural strength. On some objects (like Mercury or the Moon: see https://arxiv.org/pdf/1511.04297.pdf) there aren&amp;#x27;t any mountains high enough to hit that limit, but Earth seems to have active enough tectonics to push up at that limit despite weathering.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1511.04297/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.ed-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
