A strong loophole-free test of local realism — mentioned by eigenket

Fri, 13 Sep 2024 21:16:25 GMT

Ok I think I understand your intention with the code now. Sorry I was wrong before. I think what you're talking about here is what gets called the "detection loophole" in most of the literatire. The idea that if we detect only a small enough fraction of the events then they can be a sufficiently unrepresentative sample that we think we violated a Bell inequality even though the full statistics don't. This has (in my opinion) been comprehensively addressed already. You can check out the references in the section of the wiki article here…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

A strong loophole-free test of local realism — mentioned by noobermin

Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:13:53 GMT

In the lab http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.03189

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

A strong loophole-free test of local realism · HackerPapers discussions

A strong loophole-free test of local realism — mentioned by eigenket

A strong loophole-free test of local realism — mentioned by noobermin