HackerPapers

arXiv:1511.02222cs.LG

Deep Kernel Learning

Andrew Gordon Wilson, Zhiting Hu, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Eric P. Xing

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We introduce scalable deep kernels, which combine the structural properties of deep learning architectures with the non-parametric flexibility of kernel methods. Specifically, we transform the inputs of a spectral mixture base kernel with a deep architecture, using local kernel interpolation, inducing points, and structure exploiting (Kronecker and Toeplitz) algebra for a scalable kernel representation. These closed-form kernels can be used as drop-in replacements for standard kernels, with benefits in expressive power and scalability. We jointly learn the properties of these kernels through the marginal likelihood of a Gaussian process. Inference and learning cost $O(n)$ for $n$ training points, and predictions cost $O(1)$ per test point. On a large and diverse collection of applications, including a dataset with 2 million examples, we show improved performance over scalable Gaussian processes with flexible kernel learning models, and stand-alone deep architectures.

arXiv comments
19 pages, 6 figures
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.AIArtificial Intelligence stat.MEMethodology (Statistics) stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Aug 2025 to Aug 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • you can combine deep NNets with GPs, e.g. here https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.02222 So it isn't a matter of which is better. If you ever need to imbue your deep nets with good confidence estimates, it is definitely worth checking out.

      ysaatchiView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.