HackerPapers

arXiv:1510.07563cs.CR

Practical Attacks Against Privacy and Availability in 4G/LTE Mobile Communication Systems

Altaf Shaik, Ravishankar Borgaonkar, N. Asokan, Valtteri Niemi, Jean-Pierre Seifert

Abstract

Mobile communication systems now constitute an essential part of life throughout the world. Fourth generation "Long Term Evolution" (LTE) mobile communication networks are being deployed. The LTE suite of specifications is considered to be significantly better than its predecessors not only in terms of functionality but also with respect to security and privacy for subscribers. We carefully analyzed LTE access network protocol specifications and uncovered several vulnerabilities. Using commercial LTE mobile devices in real LTE networks, we demonstrate inexpensive, and practical attacks exploiting these vulnerabilities. Our first class of attacks consists of three different ways of making an LTE device leak its location: A semi-passive attacker can locate an LTE device within a 2 sq.km area within a city whereas an active attacker can precisely locate an LTE device using GPS co-ordinates or trilateration via cell-tower signal strength information. Our second class of attacks can persistently deny some or all services to a target LTE device. To the best of our knowledge, our work constitutes the first publicly reported practical attacks against LTE access network protocols. We present several countermeasures to resist our specific attacks. We also discuss possible trade-offs that may explain why these vulnerabilities exist and recommend that safety margins introduced into future specifications to address such trade-offs should incorporate greater agility to accommodate subsequent changes in the trade-off equilibrium.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CRCryptography and Security

On Hacker News

Linked by 4 identifiable commenters in 4 comments across 4 threads, from Oct 2015 to May 2023. Found in 1 HN submission from Oct 2015 to Oct 2015. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments4 threads

    • * GSM (2g) does not have authentication at all. * 3G has no integrity protection. Downgrade attacks from 3G->2G work. Also, it's the base station who decides if authentication and encryption is done. Fake base stations can still be used to track location, intercept calls and…

      NokinsideView on HNParent context

    • This floated through my Twitter stream yesterday (I think via @thegrugg) - as I was reading it I kept thinking "Really? Is there even a vaguely plausible explanation for that choice of leaving a command message unencrypted and unauthenticated that doesn't boil down to 'so the…

      bigiainView on HNParent context

    • tldr: 1) LTE uses broadcast messages to do push notifications. These are unencrypted and unauthenticated. Researchers can trigger them silently by spamming you on Facebook, and triangulate your location since the LTE network only sends the pages to the geographic location you…

      rmacView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.