<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Concerning the variability of beta-decay measurements · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.05996/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.05996/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Concerning the variability of beta-decay measurements — mentioned by _rpd</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10516030</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1510.05996:10516030</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 20:50:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s a recent summary ... &amp;gt; Concerning the variability of beta-decay measurements &amp;gt; (Submitted on 20 Oct 2015) &amp;gt; Many experiments have been carried out to study the beta-decay rates of a variety of nuclides, and many - but not all - of these experiments yield evidence of variability of these rates. While there is as yet no accepted theory to explain patterns in the results, a number of conjectures have been proposed. We discuss three prominent conjectures (which are not mutually exclusive) - that variability of beta-decay rates may be due to (a) environmental influences, (b) solar…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.05996/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>nucl-ex</category></item></channel></rss>
