<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.04342/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.04342/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests — mentioned by daxat_staglatz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18174534</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1510.04342:18174534</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 09:50:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I haven&amp;#x27;t found any, either. This is a shame because economics is already a computational discipline and increasingly so. It can be of interest to the HN crowd. There is an awful lot of programming done by people that are not professional programmers. As an economist myself, I think code have become so central to our profession that we can no longer afford to ignore software engineering best practices. Conversely, there may be quite a few topics in computational economics that interest programmers. For instance, an awful lot of macroeconomics - including to an extent Romer&amp;#x27;s sub-field…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.04342/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ME</category></item><item><title>Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13357937</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1510.04342:13357937</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 17:25:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Causal inference from Random Forests&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.04342/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ME</category></item></channel></rss>
