<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Particle-hole symmetry, many-body localization, and topological edge modes · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.04282/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.04282/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Particle-hole symmetry, many-body localization, and topological edge modes — mentioned by selimthegrim</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12474848</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1510.04282:12474848</guid><pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2016 18:36:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#x27;re absolutely correct. There are some nice papers by Potter, Vasseur et al. and Else and Nayak which illustrate your latter point in gory mathematical detail (they derive constraints from symmetry on symmetry protected topological phases and then use math to relate that to the sort of Floquet phases you can protect using symmetries). Of course, if you&amp;#x27;re actually Dominic Else, I defer to you... e: Hah, I commented without reading the article, this is the PRL publication of the Else and Nayak paper, with an added co-author, I had read the preprint a few months ago. The other paper good to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.04282/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.dis-nn</category></item></channel></rss>
