<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Triangulum II: Possibly a Very Dense Ultra-Faint Dwarf Galaxy · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.03856/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.03856/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Triangulum II: Possibly a Very Dense Ultra-Faint Dwarf Galaxy — mentioned by antognini</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13068993</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1510.03856:13068993</guid><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 06:59:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;As a general principle I would advise a grain of salt whenever a physicist claims to have solved an outstanding astrophysical problem. Verlinde is a great physicist --- I remember reading Verlinde&amp;#x27;s paper on entropic gravity when it came out and I&amp;#x27;m still excited about that idea. But someone with a background in pure physics often lacks the background in astronomy to know whether their ideas will work. (I remember hearing a visiting physicist present his ideas about stars producing axions, and having an astronomy professor point out that if he was right, Cepheid variables would not pulsate at…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.03856/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item></channel></rss>
