<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Four lectures on quasi-local mass · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.02931/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.02931/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Four lectures on quasi-local mass — mentioned by codethief</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44252299</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1510.02931:44252299</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 22:01:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Combined with the other observation that our universe has uniform density at large scales s/has/had at the time of recombination It is largely an assumption of LCDM that we can treat the universe as practically homogeneous throughout its entire evolution but potentially not a very well-founded at that [0, 1]. &amp;gt; I always felt uncomfortable with that characterization. It seems more reasonable to me to think of dark energy as _negative energy_ - i.e. a loss of overall energy. Your intuition is correct. If the Lambda term in the Einstein field equations is moved over to the side of the energy…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.02931/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
