<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Deep convolutional acoustic word embeddings using word-pair side information · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.01032/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.01032/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Deep convolutional acoustic word embeddings using word-pair side information — mentioned by kastnerkyle</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12680301</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1510.01032:12680301</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 22:35:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There are a number of papers tackling a similar task [0][1][2] for anyone who is interested. There isn&amp;#x27;t enough information to tell exactly what is going on with Deepgram, but one way to approach this would be to construct a shared embedding space for words/phrases and speech. These types of embedding spaces are powerful [3][4][5], but not magic. Cool demo, looking forward to seeing more detail about what is going on. However I would quibble with the STT WER quoted above. Maybe in noisy environments with unknown speakers (and no voice normalization) this is accurate, but the kinds of clean…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1510.01032/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
