<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learned · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1509.06321/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1509.06321/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learned — mentioned by rickdeveloper</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26067063</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1509.06321:26067063</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 16:59:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an interesting idea. I wonder if we could then use something like [0] to trace back &amp;quot;gay-ness&amp;quot; as well as other &amp;quot;personality features&amp;quot; (I&amp;#x27;m not sure what the correct term is here) to the exact genes. One potential issue I see is that the DNA of any person has an arbitrary length, which poses some challenges in the design of a neural network. Traditionally, this has been solved with LSTMs or RNNs, but as far I know these are designed for data with a temporal dimension (such as text or speech, which progress with time). I&amp;#x27;m not sure if that&amp;#x27;s true for DNA. [0]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1509.06321/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
