HackerPapers

arXiv:1509.05576math.NT

An essay on the Riemann Hypothesis

Alain Connes

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The Riemann hypothesis is, and will hopefully remain for a long time, a great motivation to uncover and explore new parts of the mathematical world. After reviewing its impact on the development of algebraic geometry we discuss three strategies, working concretely at the level of the explicit formulas. The first strategy is "analytic" and is based on Riemannian spaces and Selberg's work on the trace formula and its comparison with the explicit formulas. The second is based on algebraic geometry and the Riemann-Roch theorem. We establish a framework in which one can transpose many of the ingredients of the Weil proof as reformulated by Mattuck, Tate and Grothendieck. This framework is elaborate and involves noncommutative geometry, Grothendieck toposes and tropical geometry. We point out the remaining difficulties and show that RH gives a strong motivation to develop algebraic geometry in the emerging world of characteristic one. Finally we briefly discuss a third strategy based on the development of a suitable "Weil cohomology", the role of Segal's Gamma-rings and of topological cyclic homology as a model for "absolute algebra" and as a cohomological tool.

arXiv comments
To appear in the Springer volume entitled Open Problems in Mathematics, edited jointly by John F. Nash and Michael. Th. Rassias
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
math.NTNumber Theory math.QAQuantum Algebra

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 3 HN submissions from Sep 2015 to Nov 2015. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.