HackerPapers

arXiv:1509.04764cs.IT

Repairing Reed-Solomon Codes

Venkatesan Guruswami, Mary Wootters

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We study the performance of Reed-Solomon (RS) codes for the \em exact repair problem \em in distributed storage. Our main result is that, in some parameter regimes, Reed-Solomon codes are optimal regenerating codes, among MDS codes with linear repair schemes. Moreover, we give a characterization of MDS codes with linear repair schemes which holds in any parameter regime, and which can be used to give non-trivial repair schemes for RS codes in other settings. More precisely, we show that for $k$-dimensional RS codes whose evaluation points are a finite field of size $n$, there are exact repair schemes with bandwidth $(n-1)\log((n-1)/(n-k))$ bits, and that this is optimal for any MDS code with a linear repair scheme. In contrast, the naive (commonly implemented) repair algorithm for this RS code has bandwidth $k\log(n)$ bits. When the entire field is used as evaluation points, the number of nodes $n$ is much larger than the number of bits per node (which is $O(\log(n))$), and so this result holds only when the degree of sub-packetization is small. However, our method applies in any parameter regime, and to illustrate this for high levels of sub-packetization we give an improved repair scheme for a specific (14,10)-RS code used in the Facebook Hadoop Analytics cluster.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.ITInformation Theory cs.CCComputational Complexity

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Sep 2015 to Sep 2015. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.