<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Thermodynamical cost of some interpretations of quantum theory · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1509.03641/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1509.03641/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Thermodynamical cost of some interpretations of quantum theory — mentioned by ivan_ah</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13233453</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1509.03641:13233453</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 23:06:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;arXiv link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.03641&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1509.03641/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Thermodynamical cost of some interpretations of quantum theory — mentioned by n4r9</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10232428</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1509.03641:10232428</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:51:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#x27;t like to sound glib, but... &amp;gt; In fact, there is no randomness and non-predictability in quantum mechanics. Depends on the interpretation. &amp;gt; wave function collapse in a quantum system is the consequence of coupling the system to a larger, external one that becomes entangled with the &amp;quot;small&amp;quot; quantum system Depends on the interpretation. &amp;gt; we ourselves are described by a quantum wave function Depends on the interpretation. &amp;gt; Different interpretations of quantum mechanics like the &amp;quot;Many Worlds&amp;quot; or the &amp;quot;Copenhague&amp;quot; varieties are basically just arguing about what happens with a wave function…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1509.03641/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Thermodynamical cost of some interpretations of quantum theory — mentioned by pygy_</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10232101</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1509.03641:10232101</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:41:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper gives the context in which this other one has been written: http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.03641 Discussed 13 hours ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10228435&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1509.03641/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Thermodynamical cost of some interpretations of quantum theory — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10228435</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1509.03641:10228435</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:48:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Thermodynamical cost of some interpretations of quantum theory&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;49 points; 18 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1509.03641/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
