<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The vector algebra war: a historical perspective · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1509.00501/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1509.00501/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The vector algebra war: a historical perspective — mentioned by antman</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22812021</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1509.00501:22812021</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2020 11:45:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Maxwell&amp;#x27;s equations are an artifact of the Mathematical Formulation and they can be written in a perhaps easer way. If one describes them in Geometrc Algebra terms it is just one equation [0] and one can understand it in a natural way. During the nineteenth century and the discussions on different formal ways to describe vector fields Hamilton&amp;#x27;s quartenion system prevailed. Maxwell had reservations and presented his treatise of electricity and electromagnetism as &amp;quot;the introduction of the ideas, as distinguished from the operations and methods of Quaternions&amp;quot; [1], thus the formulation we know.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1509.00501/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.hist-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
