Towards universal neural nets: Gibbs machines and ACE — mentioned by themann9

Mon, 07 Sep 2015 04:59:27 GMT

Guy, the only thing abundantly clear is that you are full of dung. Your shameless self-promotion may piss-off the police chief here - murbard2, so be more careful. Ten digits better classified, out of 10000? With a structure more complicated than a human DNA vs two lines of code? Congratulations! Or, and how are your "stairways-to-heaven" even remotely universal? Show us something these networks have generated like the VAE or Gibbs/ACE papers? Perhaps you can show some density estimation results as in http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.04623 or http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06585? Oja and Hyvarinen are…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Towards universal neural nets: Gibbs machines and ACE — HN submission

Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:29:10 GMT

Towards universal neural nets: Gibbs machines and ACE

47 points; 20 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Towards universal neural nets: Gibbs machines and ACE · HackerPapers discussions

Towards universal neural nets: Gibbs machines and ACE — mentioned by themann9

Towards universal neural nets: Gibbs machines and ACE — HN submission