<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Understanding the Pointer States · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1508.04101/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1508.04101/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Understanding the Pointer States — mentioned by japanuspus</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30611966</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1508.04101:30611966</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 07:53:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;As a former quantum physicist who has just decided to go back into quantum computing, this was my take as well: Introductory quantum physics courses may still include wave-function collapse and all that nonsense, but I have not met many physicists who use this as a mental model. To be a bit more specific as to how _decoherence_ solves this, one way to see it is that classicality (i.e. observables having specific values) is an emergent property in the limit of near-infinite degrees of freedom in the same way that e.g. thermodynamic properties (temperature etc.) are emergent properties of…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1508.04101/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
