<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Reversibility and the structure of the local state space · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1508.03491/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1508.03491/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Reversibility and the structure of the local state space — mentioned by n4r9</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15770043</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1508.03491:15770043</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 08:13:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I made use of this astonishing (to me) fact a couple of years ago, in an article I co-authored on hypothetical physical theories [0]. We considered theories where the &amp;quot;Bloch sphere&amp;quot; [1] of a primitive system took the form of a regular convex polytope, and showed that this led to highly restricted multi-system dynamics. We used the fact that every facet was diametrically opposite to another facet, except in the case of odd-sided polygons, for which we had to drive the same thing in a different way. It wasn&amp;#x27;t a huge or surprising result, but it was a lot of fun to prove something that applied…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1508.03491/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
