<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Stress Testing the Booters: Understanding and Undermining the Business of DDoS Services · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1508.03410/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1508.03410/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Stress Testing the Booters: Understanding and Undermining the Business of DDoS Services — mentioned by echochamber1</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11342545</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1508.03410:11342545</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 06:34:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;#x27;re using CloudFlare to protect your site against DDoS, you&amp;#x27;re essentially participating as part of a passive protection racket. &amp;quot;That&amp;#x27;s a pretty bold claim,&amp;quot; you may reasonably contend. Here are the facts: - A very large proportion (I would conservatively estimate &amp;gt;50%) of DDoS-for-hire sites are hosted on CloudFlare. I couldn&amp;#x27;t find a comprehensive survey of all attack service providers, but in a recent sample[1], 100% of the services were protected by CloudFlare. - CloudFlare will not discontinue service for customers offering DDoS-for-hire services unless you are the police and…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1508.03410/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
