<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The potential for super-Nyquist asteroseismology with TESS · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1508.02717/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1508.02717/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The potential for super-Nyquist asteroseismology with TESS — mentioned by cyphar</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18519661</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1508.02717:18519661</guid><pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 00:21:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; FFT requires input data to be sampled with a constant sampling interval. You can use something like Lomb-Scargle to get a periodogram without needing it to be evenly spaced. This also has the benefit of potentially making the Nyquist limit much softer (depending on how randomly-variating the sample interval is)[1]. [1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.02717&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1508.02717/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.SR</category></item></channel></rss>
