https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1508.01982/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15473981urn:hackerpapers:mention:1508.01982:15473981Sat, 14 Oct 2017 20:08:33 GMT<p>The JuMP paper [1] compares JuMP with all the major commercial and open source options in this area, including Pyomo. Pyomo is orders of magnitude slower than JuMP and doesn&#x27;t scale as well so the comparison gets worse as problems get larger. (Pyomo had the worst performance of all the systems compared.) JuMP is the only open source option that has performance like commercial systems. Throw in JuMP&#x27;s improved expressiveness and usability over Pyomo and JuMP&#x27;s incredibly broad solver support [2] and there&#x27;s really no contest. These days, your best option in Python is probably to call JuMP via…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1508.01982/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>math.OChttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10308944urn:hackerpapers:mention:1508.01982:10308944Thu, 01 Oct 2015 02:55:10 GMT<p>If you&#x27;re interested in model generation time, have a look at JuMP (https://github.com/JuliaOpt/JuMP.jl). More discussions on the speed of modeling languages at http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.1431 and http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.01982</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1508.01982/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>math.OC