<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A New Logic For Uncertainty · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1506.03123/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1506.03123/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A New Logic For Uncertainty — mentioned by crawfordcomeaux</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48527435</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1506.03123:48527435</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 14:19:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s racism that fuels this comparison with value. I&amp;#x27;m living in a yurt and would gladly trade it for a mud hut. Humans are currently threatening most life (including our own species) on the surface with extinction in multiple ways. That&amp;#x27;s not value and it is an inevitable conclusion to any form of binary thinking at scale. That includes the thinking that says &amp;quot;this way of life has more value than that way of life.&amp;quot; We&amp;#x27;re living in the curse of the Greeks, whereby we&amp;#x27;ve grown away from connection with our environments in the same ways they did by pedestaling their ways, including a form of…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1506.03123/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.LO</category></item><item><title>A New Logic For Uncertainty — mentioned by crawfordcomeaux</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28661662</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1506.03123:28661662</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2021 15:31:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;And some believe we need uncertainty to be accounted for, too! https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.03123 https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.01310&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1506.03123/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.LO</category></item><item><title>A New Logic For Uncertainty — mentioned by crawfordcomeaux</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28661632</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1506.03123:28661632</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2021 15:29:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for all of this and the large type, too! Would you do uncertainty logic next? https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.03123 https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.01310&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1506.03123/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.LO</category></item></channel></rss>
