HAT-P-56b: An inflated massive Hot Jupiter transiting a bright F star followed up with K2 Campaign 0 observations — mentioned by abdullahkhalids

Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:01:22 GMT

There is no gold standard for confirming the existence of an exoplanet. Very different techniques are used by different groups based on the type and source of experimental data. Every method has its strengths and weaknesses, therefore, often planets detected by one method are then reconfirmed using another method applied to the same or new data. Here is a quote from Huang et a. (2015) https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.01776 "This planet was originally identified as a HATNet (Bakos et al. 2004) planetary candidate, was followed up by the TRES spectrograph on the FLWO 1.5 m telescope, and also by the…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

HAT-P-56b: An inflated massive Hot Jupiter transiting a bright F star followed up with K2 Campaign 0 observations · HackerPapers discussions

HAT-P-56b: An inflated massive Hot Jupiter transiting a bright F star followed up with K2 Campaign 0 observations — mentioned by abdullahkhalids