<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Is there proof that backreaction of inhomogeneities is irrelevant in cosmology? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1505.07800/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1505.07800/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Is there proof that backreaction of inhomogeneities is irrelevant in cosmology? — mentioned by Certhas</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21280103</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1505.07800:21280103</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:56:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Hossenfelder is refering to the ongoing discussion in the physicist community on this topic. Some of the giants of the field (Wald, Ellis) semi-regularly exchange papers on this. It&amp;#x27;s not a hunch. Green and Wald tried to proof that the inhomogeneities don&amp;#x27;t matter, others disagree that they proofed anything of the sort. It&amp;#x27;s a fairly robust debate, and I am not qualified to summarize the state of play. Here are some slides: https://cosmoback.sciencesconf.org/data/program/Ostrowski.pd... Edit: The rebuttal paper to Green-Wald from three years ago already has 100 citations...…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1505.07800/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
