<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1505.05770/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1505.05770/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows — mentioned by yorwba</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21954249</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1505.05770:21954249</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2020 11:12:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You can do basic math to a multivariate normal distribution to approximate other distributions. In classic feedforward networks, that&amp;#x27;s achieved by using nonlinear activation functions. Very wide networks turn into Gaussian processes in the limit [0]. There are also approaches explicitly embracing the &amp;quot;basic math on multivariate normal distributions&amp;quot; framework using normalizing flows [1]. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.00165 [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05770&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1505.05770/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item><item><title>Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows — mentioned by trextrex</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16630030</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1505.05770:16630030</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:26:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There was one theoretical paper to enable learning more complex distributions in the encoding layer(s) while still using a factorized gaussian or similarly simple distribution to derive the learning rules [1]. This approach should, in theory, lead to generation of sharper images, although that particular paper doesn&amp;#x27;t show examples of it. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05770&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1505.05770/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
