<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>When causation does not imply correlation: robust violations of the Faithfulness axiom · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1505.03118/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1505.03118/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>When causation does not imply correlation: robust violations of the Faithfulness axiom — mentioned by crvdgc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28780602</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1505.03118:28780602</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 01:18:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; 6. Causation does not imply correlation: https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.03118 And in the paper, from the abstract, &amp;gt; We demonstrate that the Faithfulness property that is assumed in much causal analysis is robustly violated for a large class of systems... In preliminaries, &amp;gt; The Faithfulness assumption is that no conditional correlation among the variables is zero unless it is necessarily so given the Markov property. So probably a more accurate laymam description would be &amp;quot;not all causations are observable as a statistical correlation relationship&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1505.03118/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ME</category></item></channel></rss>
