<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Computational Universality of Metabolic Computing · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1505.02420/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1505.02420/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Computational Universality of Metabolic Computing — mentioned by guiraldelli</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20153456</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1505.02420:20153456</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 06:52:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;For those interested in the subject, the field that formalises the computation of chemical-reaction-like grammars is called P systems (or Membrane Computing) [1], which are known to be super-Turing devices [2]. Well, given the resistance to accept the practicality of super-Turing devices, a simpler model exists, MP systems [3], with simplified semantics and practical for biological applications. MP systems are proved to be Turing-equivalent and there is a nice paper [4,5] (shameless promotion) that shows how to convert each type of &amp;quot;chemical reaction equation&amp;quot; into basic, sequential…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1505.02420/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.ET</category></item></channel></rss>
