HackerPapers

arXiv:1505.00853cs.LG

Empirical Evaluation of Rectified Activations in Convolutional Network

Bing Xu, Naiyan Wang, Tianqi Chen, Mu Li

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the performance of different types of rectified activation functions in convolutional neural network: standard rectified linear unit (ReLU), leaky rectified linear unit (Leaky ReLU), parametric rectified linear unit (PReLU) and a new randomized leaky rectified linear units (RReLU). We evaluate these activation function on standard image classification task. Our experiments suggest that incorporating a non-zero slope for negative part in rectified activation units could consistently improve the results. Thus our findings are negative on the common belief that sparsity is the key of good performance in ReLU. Moreover, on small scale dataset, using deterministic negative slope or learning it are both prone to overfitting. They are not as effective as using their randomized counterpart. By using RReLU, we achieved 75.68\% accuracy on CIFAR-100 test set without multiple test or ensemble.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jan 2017 to Jan 2017.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • The sparsity encouraged by ReLUs is one reason they are used but not to the exclusion of all other activations. ReLU variants can indeed outperform standard ReLU[0] but sometimes sparsity is a desired property. For example, in generative models. [0]…

      jimflemingView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.