<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bell's inequality violation with spins in silicon · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1504.03112/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1504.03112/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Bell's inequality violation with spins in silicon — mentioned by westurner</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34466975</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1504.03112:34466975</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2023 15:19:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Bell&amp;#x27;s inequality violation with spins in silicon&amp;quot; (2015) https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.03112 I had heard that Bell&amp;#x27;s actually means that there is a high error rate in transmitting quantum states - 60%, I thought Wikipedia had said - through entanglement relations with physical descriptions. Doesn&amp;#x27;t entangled satellite communication violate Bell&amp;#x27;s, too? Maybe call it and emissions a &amp;quot;Hot Tub Time Machine&amp;quot;, eh?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1504.03112/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.mes-hall</category></item></channel></rss>
