<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Representing numeric data in 32 bits while preserving 64-bit precision · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1504.02914/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1504.02914/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Representing numeric data in 32 bits while preserving 64-bit precision — mentioned by radford-neal</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121075</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1504.02914:48121075</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 12:31:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Those interested in this might find my paper on &amp;quot;Representing numeric data in 32 bits while preserving 64-bit precision&amp;quot; to be of interest. Can be found at https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02914 (note the code available as auxilliary files). In the context of this compressor, it could be one of the compressors competing to compress a block. It works well for data converted from a decimal representation with a small number of digits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1504.02914/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
