<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>QUOTUS: The Structure of Political Media Coverage as Revealed by Quoting Patterns · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1504.01383/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1504.01383/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>QUOTUS: The Structure of Political Media Coverage as Revealed by Quoting Patterns — mentioned by themeek</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9697378</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1504.01383:9697378</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 03:46:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I do not know about this specific case (looking at the subreddits I truly doubt it is an example) but there are examples of systems using anti-harrassment as a means to censor particular groups, links, and ideas. With a title like &amp;quot;&amp;#x27;Troll hunting&amp;#x27; algorithm could make web a better place&amp;quot; (http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2015-04/14/google-algori...) this algorithm seems like a true boon. It&amp;#x27;s only slightly suspicious (and can easily be explained away) that two of the three websites used in its study were political websites. You&amp;#x27;d have to be pretty zany to leap to the conclusion that the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1504.01383/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
