<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Persistence of the Large Volumes in Black Holes · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1503.08245/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1503.08245/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Persistence of the Large Volumes in Black Holes — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18635966</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1503.08245:18635966</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2018 16:29:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Neglecting evaporation, it&amp;#x27;s a lot closer to Yen Chin Ong&amp;#x27;s results (and those he cites, especially Christodoulou and Rovelli [2]) than most of the comments throughout this discussion, in that with a careful choice of time coordinate a spacelike spherical sector of a Schwarzschild black hole could evolve roughly similarly. Of course, one has enormous freedom to choose spacelike hypersurfaces through a Schwarzschild black hole, so such a result is not especially interesting without some sort of uniqueness proof for the idea, and I don&amp;#x27;t think that&amp;#x27;s achievable. (cf [2]). I&amp;#x27;m also not sure this…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1503.08245/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
