<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Voting Behaviour and Power in Online Democracy: A Study of LiquidFeedback in Germany's Pirate Party · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1503.07723/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1503.07723/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Voting Behaviour and Power in Online Democracy: A Study of LiquidFeedback in Germany's Pirate Party — mentioned by heinrichhartman</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34365215</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1503.07723:34365215</guid><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 08:19:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;We looked into the data in 2015 and wrote this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07723 From the abstract: A common objection against the use of these platforms is the delegation system, where a user can delegate his vote to another user, giving rise to so-called super-voters, i.e. powerful users who receive many delegations. It has been asserted in the past that the presence of these super-voters undermines the democratic process, and therefore delegative democracy should be avoided. In this paper, we look at the emergence of super-voters in the largest delegative online democracy platform…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1503.07723/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
